EMPTY STATE
COMPARISON TOOL

JBS 15/100

(BOVESPA:JBSS3) 30 of 38 (2018)

JBS S.A. (JBS), one of the world's largest meat processing company, ranks 30th out of 38 companies. It discloses less information on its forced labor policies and practices than its peers across all themes, and no information on the theme of recruitment. The company does not seem to have improved its performance and disclosure since 2016, which due to a strengthened methodology led to a score decrease. KnowTheChain identified one allegation of forced labor in the company's supply chain. The company provided a public response to the allegation, explaining why it used the supplier (it was not included on the Brazilian government's list of companies known to use slave labor) and that it has ceased sourcing from the supplier, but it does not disclose remedy outcomes for impacted workers. The company has an opportunity to improve its performance and disclosure on the themes of recruitment, worker voice, and monitoring.

DOWNLOAD SCORECARD

15 /100

2018 Ranking: 30 of 38

HOW DO THEY COMPARE?

The comparison tool allows companies’ results to be easily compared. Up to three companies can be selected and compared against each other as shown below.

You have selected a maximum of 3 data points to compare. Remove one data point to add a new one.

loading...

24

JBS was evaluated both in 2016, when it ranked 15th out of 20 companies, and in 2018, when it ranked 30th out of 38 companies. The company did not improve its performance and disclosure since 2016. Compared to 2016, the company's score dropped nine points, from 24/100 to 15/100.

2016 BENCHMARK

15

The average score for the sector was 30/100, matching the average score in the 2016 benchmark. Compared to 2016, the number of companies assessed in 2018 increased from 20 to 38. Since 2016 the methodology has been strengthened, making it harder for companies to achieve the same score. The 19 companies benchmarked in both 2016 and 2018 saw their average score increase from 30/100 to 33/100, which is positive given the changes to the methodology.

METHODOLOGY

2016

24

JBS was evaluated both in 2016, when it ranked 15th out of 20 companies, and in 2018, when it ranked 30th out of 38 companies. The company did not improve its performance and disclosure since 2016. Compared to 2016, the company's score dropped nine points, from 24/100 to 15/100.

2016BENCHMARK

2018

15

The average score for the sector was 30/100, matching the average score in the 2016 benchmark. Compared to 2016, the number of companies assessed in 2018 increased from 20 to 38. Since 2016 the methodology has been strengthened, making it harder for companies to achieve the same score. The 19 companies benchmarked in both 2016 and 2018 saw their average score increase from 30/100 to 33/100, which is positive given the changes to the methodology.

METHODOLOGY

THEME AND INDICATOR SCORE

The benchmark methodology has seven themes, selected to capture the key areas where companies need to take action to eradicate forced labor from their supply chains. There are a total of 23 indicators across the seven themes. For each theme, a company can score a total of 100 points.

Commitment and Governance

This theme evaluates a company's commitment to addressing forced labor, whether it discloses supply chain standards, and to what extent it has management processes and board oversight, training programs, and engagement with stakeholders on forced labor in place.

OVERALL 44
INDICATORS
Commitment
50
Supply Chain Standards
70
Management and Accountability
50
Training
25
Stakeholder Engagement
25

Traceability and Risk Assessment

This theme measures the extent to which a company demonstrates an understanding of its suppliers and their workforce by disclosing relevant information (such as supplier names or sourcing countries) and assesses and discloses forced labor risks across its supply chains.

OVERALL 19
Traceability
12.5
Risk Assessment
25

Purchasing Practices

This theme assesses to what extent a company adopts responsible purchasing practices (such as providing price premiums and procurement incentives) and integrates supply chain standards into supplier selection and supplier contracts, and whether it cascades them down the supply chain.

OVERALL 16
Purchasing Practices
15
Supplier Selection
50
Integration into Supplier Contracts
0
Cascading Standards through the Supply Chain
0

Recruitment

This theme measures a company's approach to reducing the risk of exploitation of supply chain workers by recruitment agencies, eliminating workers' payment of fees during recruitment processes throughout its supply chains, and protecting the rights of migrant workers.

OVERALL 0
Recruitment Approach
0
Recruitment Fees
0
Monitoring and Ethical Recruitment
0
Migrant Worker Rights
0

Worker Voice

This theme measures the extent to which a company engages with workers in its supply chains, enables freedom of association, and ensures access to effective and trusted grievance mechanisms.

OVERALL 5
INDICATORS
Communication of Policies
0
Worker Voice
0
Freedom of Association
0
Grievance Mechanism
20

Monitoring

This theme evaluates a company's process for auditing suppliers (including whether audits include non-scheduled visits, review relevant documents such as wage slips or contracts, interview workers, and audit lower-tier suppliers) and providing disclosure on the outcomes of supplier audits.

OVERALL 5
Auditing Process
10
Audit Disclosure
0

Remedy

This theme measures the extent to which a company has corrective action plan processes for non-compliant suppliers and ensures remedy is provided to workers in its supply chains who are victims of forced labor. Publicly available allegations of forced labor in a company's supply chains that occurred in the past three years, and how a company has responded to and addressed those allegations, are also assessed as part of this theme.

OVERALL 19
Corrective Action Plans
25
Remedy Programs and Response to Allegations
12.5

Access Benchmark Data

Access the underlying data and non-scored information in a spreadsheet for ease of comparison or download all the scorecards.

DOWNLOAD