EMPTY STATE
COMPARISON TOOL

Canon 16/100

(TSE:7751) 29 of 40 (2018)

Canon Inc. (Canon) ranks 29th out of 40 companies, disclosing less information on its forced labor policies and practices than its peers. Since 2016, its score has improved from 12 to 16. This is because it has developed and disclosed policies and processes that include forced labor, such as CSR guidelines for its suppliers, internal accountability for CSR topics, internal CSR training, and a supplier selection process. It has also set up a "channel for feedback" where anyone can submit grievances regarding forced labor in the company's supply chain. The company has an opportunity to improve its performance and disclosure on the themes of recruitment, monitoring, and remedy.

DOWNLOAD SCORECARD

16 /100

2018 Ranking: 29 of 40

HOW DO THEY COMPARE?

The comparison tool allows companies’ results to be easily compared. Up to three companies can be selected and compared against each other as shown below.

You have selected a maximum of 3 data points to compare. Remove one data point to add a new one.

loading...

12

Canon was evaluated both in 2016, when it ranked 18th out of 20 companies, and in 2018, when it ranked 29th out of 40 companies. Despite a strengthened methodology which makes it harder to achieve the same score, since 2016, its score improved from 12/100 to 16/100, such that it is no longer is among the lowest scoring companies. This is because it has developed and disclosed policies and processes that include forced labor, such as CSR guidelines for its suppliers, internal accountability for CSR topics, internal CSR training, and a supplier selection process. It has also set up a "channel for feedback" where anyone can submit grievances regarding forced labor in the company's supply chain.

2016 BENCHMARK

16

The average score for the sector was 32/100, compared to 39/100 in 2016. The drop in score is due in part to the increase in number of small and mid cap companies from 20 to 40, as well as the changes made to the methodology that strengthened it. The 20 companies benchmarked in both 2016 and 2018 saw their average score improve from 39/100 to 40/100, which is notable given the changes to the methodology.

METHODOLOGY

2016

12

Canon was evaluated both in 2016, when it ranked 18th out of 20 companies, and in 2018, when it ranked 29th out of 40 companies. Despite a strengthened methodology which makes it harder to achieve the same score, since 2016, its score improved from 12/100 to 16/100, such that it is no longer is among the lowest scoring companies. This is because it has developed and disclosed policies and processes that include forced labor, such as CSR guidelines for its suppliers, internal accountability for CSR topics, internal CSR training, and a supplier selection process. It has also set up a "channel for feedback" where anyone can submit grievances regarding forced labor in the company's supply chain.

2016BENCHMARK

2018

16

The average score for the sector was 32/100, compared to 39/100 in 2016. The drop in score is due in part to the increase in number of small and mid cap companies from 20 to 40, as well as the changes made to the methodology that strengthened it. The 20 companies benchmarked in both 2016 and 2018 saw their average score improve from 39/100 to 40/100, which is notable given the changes to the methodology.

METHODOLOGY

THEME AND INDICATOR SCORE

The benchmark methodology has seven themes, selected to capture the key areas where companies need to take action to eradicate forced labor from their supply chains. There are a total of 23 indicators across the seven themes. For each theme, a company can score a total of 100 points.

Commitment and Governance

This theme evaluates a company's commitment to addressing forced labor, supply chain standards, management processes and board oversight, training programs, and engagement with stakeholders.

OVERALL 42
INDICATORS
Commitment
100
Supply Chain Standards
60
Management and Accountability
25
Training
25
Stakeholder Engagement
0

Traceability and Risk Assessment

This theme measures the extent to which a company demonstrates an understanding of its suppliers and their workforce by disclosing relevant information, and assesses and discloses forced labor risks across its supply chains.

OVERALL 25
Traceability
50
Risk Assessment
0

Purchasing Practices

This theme assesses to what extent a company adopts responsible purchasing practices and integrates supply chain standards into supplier selection and supplier contracts. It also assesses the degree to which a company cascades their standards down its supply chains.

OVERALL 38
Purchasing Practices
0
Supplier Selection
100
Integration into Supplier Contracts
0
Cascading Standards through the Supply Chain
50

Recruitment

This theme measures a company's approach to reducing the risk of exploitation of supply chain workers by recruitment agencies, eliminating workers' payment of fees during recruitment processes throughout its supply chains, and protecting the rights of migrant workers.

OVERALL 0
Recruitment Approach
0
Recruitment Fees
0
Monitoring and Ethical Recruitment
0
Migrant Worker Rights
0

Worker Voice

This theme measures the extent to which a company engages with workers in its supply chains, enables freedom of association, and ensures access to effective and trusted grievance mechanisms.

OVERALL 5
INDICATORS
Communication of Policies
0
Worker Voice
0
Freedom of Association
0
Grievance Mechanism
20

Monitoring

This theme evaluates a company's process for auditing suppliers (including whether it performs non-scheduled visits, reviews relevant documents such as wage slips or contracts, interviews workers, and audits lower-tier suppliers) and providing disclosure on the outcomes of supplier audits.

OVERALL 0
Auditing Process
0
Audit Disclosure
0

Remedy

This theme measures the extent to which a company has corrective action plan processes for non-compliant suppliers and ensures remedy is provided to workers in its supply chains who are victims of forced labor. Publicly available allegations of forced labor in a company's supply chains which occurred in the past three years, and how a company has responded to and addressed those allegations, are also assessed as part of this theme.

OVERALL 0
Corrective Action Plans
0
Remedy Programs and Response to Allegations
0

Access Benchmark Data

Access the underlying data and non-scored information in a spreadsheet for ease of comparison or download all the scorecards.

DOWNLOAD