EMPTY STATE
COMPARISON TOOL

Nokia 38/100

(HLSE:NOKIA) 13 of 40 (2018)

Nokia Corp. (Nokia) ranks 13th out of 40 companies. On average, it discloses more information on its forced labor policies and practices than its peers, with particularly strong disclosures for traceability and risk assessment and monitoring but limited disclosure on the theme of recruitment. Notably, the company discloses a supply chain risk assessment which considers aspects such as informal employment, a map highlighting the degree of modern slavery in its sourcing countries, and several examples of concrete steps suppliers have taken to address violations of the company's standards. Further, the company has committed to implement a supplier worker empowerment program by 2020. Additional steps the company could take to address forced labor risks in its supply chains include strengthening its disclosure and practices on the themes of recruitment and worker voice, developing and disclosing a managerial structure with responsibilities for implementing its supply chain policies and engaging with stakeholders on forced labor.

DOWNLOAD SCORECARD

38 /100

2018 Ranking: 13 of 40

HOW DO THEY COMPARE?

The comparison tool allows companies’ results to be easily compared. Up to three companies can be selected and compared against each other as shown below.

You have selected a maximum of 3 data points to compare. Remove one data point to add a new one.

loading...

38

The average score for the sector was 32/100, compared to 39/100 in 2016. The drop in score is due in part to the increase in number of small and mid cap companies from 20 to 40, as well as the changes made to the methodology that strengthened it. The 20 companies benchmarked in both 2016 and 2018 saw their average score improve from 39/100 to 40/100, which is notable given the changes to the methodology.

METHODOLOGY

2018

38

The average score for the sector was 32/100, compared to 39/100 in 2016. The drop in score is due in part to the increase in number of small and mid cap companies from 20 to 40, as well as the changes made to the methodology that strengthened it. The 20 companies benchmarked in both 2016 and 2018 saw their average score improve from 39/100 to 40/100, which is notable given the changes to the methodology.

METHODOLOGY

THEME AND INDICATOR SCORE

The benchmark methodology has seven themes, selected to capture the key areas where companies need to take action to eradicate forced labor from their supply chains. There are a total of 23 indicators across the seven themes. For each theme, a company can score a total of 100 points.

Commitment and Governance

This theme evaluates a company's commitment to addressing forced labor, supply chain standards, management processes and board oversight, training programs, and engagement with stakeholders.

OVERALL 52
INDICATORS
Commitment
100
Supply Chain Standards
60
Management and Accountability
0
Training
100
Stakeholder Engagement
0

Traceability and Risk Assessment

This theme measures the extent to which a company demonstrates an understanding of its suppliers and their workforce by disclosing relevant information, and assesses and discloses forced labor risks across its supply chains.

OVERALL 63
Traceability
50
Risk Assessment
75

Purchasing Practices

This theme assesses to what extent a company adopts responsible purchasing practices and integrates supply chain standards into supplier selection and supplier contracts. It also assesses the degree to which a company cascades their standards down its supply chains.

OVERALL 50
Purchasing Practices
0
Supplier Selection
50
Integration into Supplier Contracts
100
Cascading Standards through the Supply Chain
50

Recruitment

This theme measures a company's approach to reducing the risk of exploitation of supply chain workers by recruitment agencies, eliminating workers' payment of fees during recruitment processes throughout its supply chains, and protecting the rights of migrant workers.

OVERALL 6
Recruitment Approach
0
Recruitment Fees
25
Monitoring and Ethical Recruitment
0
Migrant Worker Rights
0

Worker Voice

This theme measures the extent to which a company engages with workers in its supply chains, enables freedom of association, and ensures access to effective and trusted grievance mechanisms.

OVERALL 10
INDICATORS
Communication of Policies
0
Worker Voice
0
Freedom of Association
0
Grievance Mechanism
40

Monitoring

This theme evaluates a company's process for auditing suppliers (including whether it performs non-scheduled visits, reviews relevant documents such as wage slips or contracts, interviews workers, and audits lower-tier suppliers) and providing disclosure on the outcomes of supplier audits.

OVERALL 60
Auditing Process
80
Audit Disclosure
40

Remedy

This theme measures the extent to which a company has corrective action plan processes for non-compliant suppliers and ensures remedy is provided to workers in its supply chains who are victims of forced labor. Publicly available allegations of forced labor in a company's supply chains which occurred in the past three years, and how a company has responded to and addressed those allegations, are also assessed as part of this theme.

OVERALL 25
Corrective Action Plans
50
Remedy Programs and Response to Allegations
0

Access Benchmark Data

Access the underlying data and non-scored information in a spreadsheet for ease of comparison or download all the scorecards.

DOWNLOAD