Company Ranking33 out of
Tokyo Electron Ltd. (Tokyo Electron), a semiconductor equipment supplier to companies such as Intel and Samsung, ranks 33rd out of 49 companies and discloses less information on its forced labor policies and practices than its peers. Compared to 2018, the company’s score decreased by four points as the company disclosed only limited improvements, namely training employees on forced labor risks. The company’s score is based on its performance on the themes of Commitment & Governance, Purchasing Practices, and Recruitment. The company is encouraged to improve its performance and disclosure on the themes of Traceability & Risk Assessment, Worker Voice, and Remedy.
HOW DO THEY COMPARE?
The comparison tool allows companies' results to be easily compared. Up to two additional companies can be selected and compare against each other as shown below.
THEME & indicator score
The benchmark methodology has seven themes, selected to capture the key areas where companies need to take action to eradicate forced labour from their supply chains. The themes are comprised of a total of 12 key indicators. For each indicator, a company can score a total of 100 points.
Commitment and Governance
|Commitment||100 / 100|
|Supplier Code of Conduct||90 / 100|
|Management and Accountability||25 / 100|
|Training||15 / 100|
|Stakeholder Engagement||25 / 100|
Traceability and Risk Assessment
|Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency||0 / 100|
|Risk Assessment||0 / 100|
|Purchasing Practices||12.5 / 100|
|Supplier Selection||50 / 100|
|Integration into Supplier Contracts||0 / 100|
|Recruitment Approach||0 / 100|
|Recruitment Fees||75 / 100|
|Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment||0 / 100|
|Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions||30 / 100|
|Freedom of Association||0 / 100|
|Worker Engagement||12.5 / 100|
|Grievance Mechanism||10 / 100|
|Monitoring Process||0 / 100|
|Monitoring Disclosure||10 / 100|
|Corrective Action Plans||0 / 100|
|Remedy Programs||0 / 100|