Company Ranking18 out of
Under Armour Inc. (Under Armour), a US-based apparel and footwear company, ranks 21st out of 43 companies, disclosing more information on its forced labor policies and practices than its peers on all themes except Recruitment. Compared to 2016, the company improved its score by six points. Since 2016, the company has improved by disclosing requirements for its auditors and a supplier list which includes the names, addresses, and number of workers for the majority of its suppliers. It also discloses that it assessed human rights risks, placed orders at suppliers based on social compliance performance, extended its grievance hotline to its suppliers’ workers, and audited some second-tier suppliers. Additional steps the company could take to address forced labor risks in its supply chains include strengthening its disclosure and practices on the themes of Commitment & Governance, Recruitment, and Worker Voice.
HOW DO THEY COMPARE?
The comparison tool allows companies' results to be easily compared. Up to two additional companies can be selected and compare against each other as shown below.
THEME & indicator score
The benchmark methodology has seven themes, selected to capture the key areas where companies need to take action to eradicate forced labour from their supply chains. The themes are comprised of a total of 12 key indicators. For each indicator, a company can score a total of 100 points.
Commitment and Governance
This theme evaluates a company's commitment to addressing forced labor, whether it discloses supply chain standards, and to what extent it has management processes and board oversight, training programs, and engagement with stakeholders on forced labor in place.
|Commitment||100 / 100|
|Supply Chain Standards||90 / 100|
|Management and Accountability||50 / 100|
|Training||50 / 100|
|Stakeholder Engagement||25 / 100|
Traceability and Risk Assessment
This theme measures the extent to which a company demonstrates an understanding of its suppliers and their workforce by disclosing relevant information (such as supplier names or sourcing countries) and assesses and discloses forced labor risks across its supply chains.
|Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency||37.5 / 100|
|Risk Assessment||50 / 100|
This theme assesses to what extent a company adopts responsible purchasing practices (such as providing price premiums and procurement incentives) and integrates supply chain standards into supplier selection and supplier contracts, and whether it cascades them down the supply chain.
|Purchasing Practices||30 / 100|
|Supplier Selection||50 / 100|
|Integration into Supplier Contracts||50 / 100|
|Cascading Standards Through the Supply Chain||50 / 100|
|Recruitment Approach||0 / 100|
|Recruitment Fees||25 / 100|
|Monitoring and Ethical Recruitment||25 / 100|
|Migrant Worker Rights||0 / 100|
This theme measures the extent to which a company engages with workers in its supply chains, enables freedom of association, and ensures access to effective and trusted grievance mechanisms.
|Communication of Policies||75 / 100|
|Worker Voice||0 / 100|
|Freedom of Association||0 / 100|
|Grievance Mechanism||80 / 100|
This theme evaluates a company's process for auditing suppliers, including whether audits include non-scheduled visits, review relevant documents such as wage slips or contracts, interview workers, and audit lower-tier suppliers and provide disclosure on the outcomes of supplier audits.
|Auditing Process||90 / 100|
|Auditing Disclosure||/ 100|
This theme measures the extent to which a company has corrective action plans and processes for non-compliant suppliers and ensures remedy is provided to workers in its supply chains who are victims of forced labor. Publicly available allegations of forced labor in a company's supply chains that occurred in the past three years, and how a company has responded to and addressed those allegations, are also assessed as part of this theme.
|Corrective Action Plans||50 / 100|
|Remedy Programs and Response to Allegations||25 / 100|