Company Ranking10 out of
Wilmar International Ltd. (Wilmar), a Singaporean agribusiness involved in oils, grains, and sugar, ranks 10th out of 43 companies, disclosing more information on its forced labor policies and practices than its peers across all themes. Notably, Wilmar has the highest score of all the benchmarked companies headquartered in Asia. Since 2018, it has only taken limited steps to improve (namely by disclosing due diligence on potential suppliers and requiring suppliers to disclose information on their recruitment practices). As the benchmark methodology requires companies to keep up with evolving stakeholder expectations and emerging good practices, Wilmar’s score decreased by three points. KnowTheChain identified one allegation of forced labor in Wilmar’s supply chains relating to three of its suppliers. Wilmar discloses worker engagement at only one supplier and remedy outcomes at only two suppliers. Wilmar has an opportunity to improve on the themes of Purchasing Practices, Recruitment, and Worker Voice.
HOW DO THEY COMPARE?
The comparison tool allows companies' results to be easily compared. Up to two additional companies can be selected and compare against each other as shown below.
THEME & indicator score
The benchmark methodology has seven themes, selected to capture the key areas where companies need to take action to eradicate forced labor from their supply chains. There are a total of 22 indicators accross the seven themes. For each themes, a company can score a total of 100 points.
Commitment and Governance
|Commitment||100 / 100|
|Supplier Code of Conduct||80 / 100|
|Management and Accountability||100 / 100|
|Training||60 / 100|
|Stakeholder Engagement||50 / 100|
Traceability and Risk Assessment
|Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency||37.5 / 100|
|Risk Assessment||75 / 100|
|Purchasing Practices||50 / 100|
|Supplier Selection||50 / 100|
|Integration into Supplier Contracts||0 / 100|
|Recruitment Approach||15 / 100|
|Recruitment Fees||50 / 100|
|Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment||0 / 100|
|Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions||60 / 100|
|Freedom of Association||25 / 100|
|Worker Engagement||12.5 / 100|
|Grievance Mechanism||60 / 100|
|Monitoring Process||50 / 100|
|Monitoring Disclosure||10 / 100|
|Corrective Action Plans||62.5 / 100|
|Remedy Programs||50 / 100|